Eyetv Mac Software Download
A Beta version of Sierra is not the same as the production release. And you work for Apple? Hallo Kym, Thank you for contacting Geniatech EyeTV Support. Sorry, we are still working on it. Could you please tell us your firewall set ups and are you using a antivirus software?
Eyetv mac free download - EyeTV, EyeTV Exporter, Avast Free Mac Security, and many more programs. Download EyeTV for Mac now from Softonic: 100% safe and virus free. More than 61 downloads this month. Download EyeTV latest version 2017.
Ningfeng Geniatech EyeTV Support Team The EyeTV version was/Is not a beta. Various released versions have been used since beta testing macOS Sierra 10.12 without errors/debugging required. Sierra was released to the public a month ago. The macOS beta 10.1 was just released to the public today, no one using EyeTV 3.x experienced conflicts with 10.12's new features (APFS, SIP, Finder, Mach Kernel, etc). It seems you simply have been using the incorrect version of EyeTV 3.x. As for your other question, I do work for Apple in marketing out of Munich HQ and live in Berlin.
Good to know this matter has been resolved. (Apologies as it seems I am unable to edit or delete the reply above). Anyway, biggest failure here is Geniatech since they replied 'we are working on it' translating into 'yes you're right, there is a problem'. However there is no problem since at least 2 people have tested Sierra + EyeTV and had no problems. Geniatechs reply does not surprise me. It is identical to the way that Elgato always solved problems. 'tell the customer 'we are working on it' and subsequently do nothing.
Apparently they even did not test official Sierra with EyeTV. A shame making EyeTV into abandonware. Wait, I have EyeTV 3.6.9 (7513) running on macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Beta (16B2548a). I've been using it for a long time as I work for Apple in marketing and we've been testing internal builds well before June's WWDC.
Not a problem. So I come back and point out that macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Beta is NOT the same as the final production macOS Sierra and, as an Apple employee, he should know that a Beta is not the same as a Prod release. Hell, even a simple Google search will uncover that many people reported EyeTV worked with macOS Sierra Beta but subsequently didn't with the production release. So even though I copied a direct response from Geniatech support (having supplied them with the version of macOS Sierra and EyeTV I was using. Latest) in which they acknowledged the problem and advised they were working on it.
We have CJD2112 back on the air now telling everyone. Good to know this matter has been resolved. Resident Evil 3 Iso Download Ps1. Hey CJD2112 how about: • Contacting Geniatech support and advise them the matter has been resolved and that they should stop working on a problem that doesn't even exist. • Let Mario know the version of EyeTV that will work with the latest release of macOS Sierra PRODUCTION. • Maybe asking Geniatech support for a job. Ton, I realise it will take some time for Geniatech to get across the EyeTV code base but as you say, it's beginning to look like abandonware. Any suggested alternatives?
I probably do not fully understand your message. So 'sorry' beforehand. I Use OSX Sierra 10.12 (all updates) i.c.w. EyeTV 3.6.9 (7513) To my knowledge with are latest version and it all works fine. Wat would anyone inform Geniatech they are working on a non existing problem?
Let's be honest. It is their task to test if there is a problem. I worked with a hard/software supplier and we always checked ourselves whether the customers complaint was real and correct. Apparently they have the same philosophy as Elgato (I wonder whether the difference is only in the name) meaning 'do nothing maybe the problem resolves by itself'. As to alternatives.
Pity there is not much for the Mac besides DVBlink. DVBlink is a good program, cheaper than EyeTV and does all and more (aTV4 client available). Presently I use partly EyeTV and partly DVBlink.
The latter becauseEyeTV does not supports only the HDHR3-EU/US and not the ones with 4 decoders. Why not use DVBlink fully? Simply because scheduling of EyeTV is way more comfortable and extensive than DVBlink. Also the GUI of EyeTV looks very good where DVBlink looks like a Win/Linus product transferred to Mac (meaning 'it works, who cares about looks'). A very very positive of DVBlink is the support. It is nearly instantaneous.
You can test either a limited (only limitation 1 user) for 30 days or full-fledged version for 30 days. So give it a try. Alternative for those that have a NAS is TVHeadend.